ACCUEIL
INFERER
LEXIQUE
ENTRAÎNEMENT
STRUCTURE
 

LECTURE DETAILLE - I

Cherchez les traductions des mots soulignés au sein des expressions suivantes tirées du texte :
A- les ordinateurs ne pouvaient pas surmonter les ambiguités de la langue.  
B- la langue de tous les jours est criblée d’ambiguités  
C- des machines essentiellement stupides  
D- Les langages de programmation sont délibérément conçus pour être sans ambiguité  
E- Extraire des instructions à partir d’énoncés dans la langue de tous les jours  
F- Tapez (sur le clavier de l’ordinateur) ce que vous voulez qu’il fasse  
G- Retourner l’avion sur son dos  
H- jusqu’à ce que les brevets lui soient accordés  
I- surnommé MI-Tech  
J- il nous transformera tous un jour en programmeurs  

 


WRITING software is a painstaking business in which you can't afford to slip up: get a single character wrong and the instructions either do nothing or go horribly wrong. In one infamous software error, a misplaced minus sign resulted in a fighter jet's control system flipping the aircraft on its back whenever it crossed the equator.
Now a new system that takes the drudgery—and some of the potential for slip-ups—out of programming is about to be launched. Its inventor hopes it will one day turn us all into programmers.
Bob Brennan. a software engineer at Cambridge-based start-up Synapse Solutions, has developed a piece of software that allows you to write a program by keying in what you want it to do in everyday language.
Dubbed Mi-Tech—short for machine intelligence technology—the software translates a typed wish list into machine code, the basic mathematical language understood by the microprocessors inside computers. But this is no easy task, because everyday language is riddled with ambiguities and double meanings. "Mi-Tech can resolve these ambiguities," claims Brennan, because it has been taught about the significance of context in the English language.
At the heart of Mi-Tech is a store of logical rules. These allow it to extract instructions from statements in ordinary language, which it then translates into machine code. In its present form, Mi-Tech has a limited lexicon of only a few hundred words, but Brennan claims this is sufficient for most of the tasks you might ask it to carry out.
Brennan says his program can write code in a fraction of the time that it takes trained programmers. He spent months writing a program manually, producing hundreds of pages of code. But given "just three pages of monologue", Mi-Tech generated a program that performed exactly the same tasks.
Vikram Adve, a programming-language researcher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign remains sceptical. "Every programming language that I have heard of has a well-defined syntax and well-defined semantics," he says. And for a very good reason: all programming languages operate on instruction compilers and hardware that are essentially dumb. "Neither can really interpret the intention of the programmer," says Adve. So programming languages are deliberately designed to be unambiguous to avoid confusion.
Brennan agrees that previously this required strict syntax. "The problem before was that computers couldn't cope with ambiguities, but now they can," he says. Mi-Tech's small lexicon means there is less room for confusion. And if it's unsure of your meaning, Mi-Tech will just say it doesn't understand.
Brennan is not going into any detail about how the system works until his patents are granted. But he hopes to be licensing his program to software companies within 18 months so that they can build it into their own packages. If that happens, you might well be able to add programs of your own design to your PC—without knowing how to code.