Questions clés de philosophie des sciences

Bibliographie - Webographie

Bibliographie

  • Arcangeli, M.

(2009), Imagination in Thought Experimentation: Sketching a Cognitive Approach to Thought Experiments. Dans Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology L. Magnani, W. Carnielli, et C. Pizzi (eds.), 571–587. Springer.

  • Arthur R.

(1999), “On Thought Experiments as A Priori Science”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13, 3, pp. 215-229.

  • Bishop M.

(1999), “Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments”, Philosophy of Science, 66, 4, pp. 534-541.

  • Bokulich A.

(2001), “Rethinking Thought Experiments”, Perspectives on Science, 9, 3, pp. 285-307.

  • Brendel E.

(2004), “Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments”, Dialectica, 58, pp. 89-108.

  • Brooks D. H. M.

(1994), “The Method of Thought Experiment”, Metaphilosophy, 25, 1, pp. 71-83.

  • Brown J. R.

(1991), The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences, Routledge, London.

  • Cohen M.

(2005), Wittgenstein's Beetle and Other Classic Thought Experiments, Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Cooper R.

(2005), “Thought Experiments”, Metaphilosophy, 36, 3, pp. 328-347.

  • Darwin C. R.

(1872), The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, John Murray, London.

  • Duhem P.

(1914), La Théorie physique: son objet, sa structure, J. Vrin, Paris.

  • DePaul, M. et Ramsey, W.

(eds.) (1998), Rethinking Intuition. The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  • Einstein A. et Infeld L.

(1938), The Evolution of Physics. The Growth of Ideas from Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta, Simon & Schuster, New York.

  • Galilei G.

(1638), Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze, Louis Elsevier, Leida.

  • Gendler Szabó T.

(1998). “Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of science, 49, 3, pp. 397-424.

  • Gendler Szabó T.

(2000), Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases, Garland Press, New York.

  • Gendler Szabó T.

(2004), “Thought Experiments Rethought — and Reperceived”, Philosophy of Science, 71, pp. 1152-1164.

  • Gilbert J. et Reiner M.

(2000), “Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning”, International Journal of Science Education, 22, 5, pp. 489-506.

  • Gooding D.

(1993), “What is Experimental About Thought Experiments?” dans D. Hull, M. Forbes et K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 280-290.

  • Hacking I.

(1993), “Do Thought Experiments have a Life of Their Own? Comments on James Brown, Nancy Nersessian and David Gooding”, dans Hull D., Forbes M. et Okruhlik K. (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 302-308.

  • Häggqvist S.

(1996), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Almqvist & Wiksel, Stockholm.

  • Horowitz T. et G. Massey

(eds.) (1991), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Savage, Rowman and Littlefield [online: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/960/].

  • Humphreys P.

(1993), “Seven Theses on Thought Experiments”, dans Earman, J. et al. (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External World. Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, University of Pittsburgh Press/Universitätsverlag Konstanz, Pittsburgh/Konstanz, pp. 205-227.

  • Ierodiakonou K. et Roux S.

(eds.) (2011) Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts, Brill.

  • Koyré A.

(1960), “Galileo's Treatise De Motu Gravium: the use and the abuse of imaginary experiment”, Revue d'Histoire des Sciences, 13, pp. 197-245.

  • Kuhn T.

(1964), “A Function for Thought Experiments”, dans Kuhn T. (1977), The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 240-265.

  • Lennox J. G.

(2005), “Darwin's Methodological Evolution”, Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 1, pp.85-99.

  • Mach E.

(1896), “Über Gedankenexperimente”, Zeitschrift für den physikalischen und chemischen Unterricht, 10, pp. 1-5.

  • McAllister J.

(2004), “Thought Experiments and the Belief in Phenomena”, Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Philosophy of Science, 71, pp. 1164-1175.

  • Miščević N.

(1992), “Mental models and thought experiments”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 6, pp. 215-226.

  • Moue A. S., Masavetas K. A. et Karayianni H.

(2006), “Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 61-75.

  • Nersessian N. J.

(1992), “How do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science”, dans R. N. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3-44.

  • Nersessian N. J.

(1993), “In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modelling”, dans Hull D., Forbes M. et Okruhlik K. (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 2, East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 291-301.

  • Norton J.

(2004a), “On Thought Experiments: Is there more to the argument?”, Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Philosophy of Science, 71, pp. 1139-1151 [online: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000719/].

  • Norton J.

(2004b), “Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism?”, dans C. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 44-66 [online: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000960/].

  • Ørsted H. C.

(1811), Förste Indledning til den Almindelige Naturlære, J. S. Schultz, Copenaghen.

  • Peijnenburg J. et Atkinson D.

(2003), “When are thought experiments poor ones?”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 34, pp. 305-322.

  • Platone, République, 327a-621d.

  • Popper K.

(1959), “On the use and misuse of imaginary experiments, especially in Quantum Theory”, dans The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, pp. 442- 456 (appendix *xi).

  • Putnam H.

(1973), “Meaning and Reference”, Journal of Philosophy, 70, 19, pp. 699-711.

  • Putnam H.

(1975), “Meaning of ‘Meaning'”, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science,7, pp. 131-193.

  • Putnam H.

(1992), “Brains in a Vat”, dans DeRose K. et Warfield T. A. (eds.), Skepticism: a Contemporary Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Searle J. R.

(1980), “Minds, Brain and Programs”, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, pp 417-424.

  • Snooks R. J.

(2006), “Another scientific practice separating chemistry from physics: thought experiments”, Foundations of Chemistry, 8, pp. 255-270.

  • Sorensen R.

(1992), Thought Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Swirski P.

(2007), Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution and Game Theory, Routledge, London & New York.

  • Witt-Hansen J.

(1976), “H.C. Örsted, Immanuel Kant, and the Thought Experiment”, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 13, pp. 48-65.

Webographie

PrécédentPrécédentSuivantSuivant
AccueilAccueilImprimerImprimer © Université de Lorraine Paternité - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de ModificationRéalisé avec Scenari (nouvelle fenêtre)