Bibliographie
- Arcangeli, M.
(2009), Imagination in Thought Experimentation: Sketching a Cognitive Approach to Thought Experiments. Dans Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology L. Magnani, W. Carnielli, et C. Pizzi (eds.), 571–587. Springer.
- Arthur R.
(1999), “On Thought Experiments as A Priori Science”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13, 3, pp. 215-229.
- Baghramian Maria
[2004] Relativism, London & New York, Routledge
- Barnes Barry & Bloor David
[1982] « Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge » Rationality and Relativism, Hollis M. & Lukes S. (eds.), Cambridge, MIT Press.
- Bishop M.
(1999), “Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments”, Philosophy of Science, 66, 4, pp. 534-541.
- Boghossian Paul
[2007/2009] La peur du savoir. Sur le relativisme et le constructivisme de la connaissance, Marseille, Agone
- Bokulich A.
(2001), “Rethinking Thought Experiments”, Perspectives on Science, 9, 3, pp. 285-307.
- Boudon Raymond
Le relativisme, Paris, Puf, collection Que Sais-je ?
- Brendel E.
(2004), “Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments”, Dialectica, 58, pp. 89-108.
- Brooks D. H. M.
(1994), “The Method of Thought Experiment”, Metaphilosophy, 25, 1, pp. 71-83.
- Brown J. R.
(1991), The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences, Routledge, London.
- Cohen M.
(2005), Wittgenstein's Beetle and Other Classic Thought Experiments, Blackwell, Oxford.
- Collins Harry M. & Pinch Trevor
Tout ce que vous devriez savoir sur la science, Paris, Seuil, collection Points
- Cooper R.
(2005), “Thought Experiments”, Metaphilosophy, 36, 3, pp. 328-347.
- Darwin C. R.
(1872), The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, John Murray, London.
- Denis Grison
Qu'est-ce que le Principe de précaution?, Vrin, 2011
- DePaul, M. et Ramsey, W.
(eds.) (1998), Rethinking Intuition. The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Dominique Bourg et Jean-Louis Schlegel
Parer aux risques de demain, le Principe de précaution, Seuil, 2001
- Duhem P.
(1914), La Théorie physique: son objet, sa structure, J. Vrin, Paris.
- Einstein A. et Infeld L.
(1938), The Evolution of Physics. The Growth of Ideas from Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta, Simon & Schuster, New York.
- Esfeld Michael
[2009] Philosophie des sciences : une introduction (2ème édition), Lausanne, Presses Polytechniques Universitaires Romandes
- Feyerabend Paul
[1979/1988] Contre la méthode. Esquisse d'une théorie anarchiste de la connaissance, Paris, Seuil, collection Points
- François Ewald, Ch. Gollier, N. de Sadeleer
Le Principe de précaution, PUF, 2001
- Franklin Allan
[2012] "Experiment in Physics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/physics-experiment/
- Galilei G.
(1638), Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze, Louis Elsevier, Leida.
- Gendler Szabó T.
(1998). “Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of science, 49, 3, pp. 397-424.
- Gendler Szabó T.
(2000), Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases, Garland Press, New York.
- Gendler Szabó T.
(2004), “Thought Experiments Rethought — and Reperceived”, Philosophy of Science, 71, pp. 1152-1164.
- Geneviève Viney et Philippe Kourilsky
Le Principe de précaution, Odile Jacob, 2000
- Gilbert J. et Reiner M.
(2000), “Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning”, International Journal of Science Education, 22, 5, pp. 489-506.
- Gingras Yves
[1995] « D'un air de radicalisme. Sur quelques tendances récentes en sociologie de la science et de la technologie », Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales n° 108, pp. 3-18
- Gooding D.
(1993), “What is Experimental About Thought Experiments?” dans D. Hull, M. Forbes et K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 280-290.
- Hacking I.
(1993), “Do Thought Experiments have a Life of Their Own? Comments on James Brown, Nancy Nersessian and David Gooding”, dans Hull D., Forbes M. et Okruhlik K. (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 302-308.
- Hacking Ian
[1983/1989] Concevoir et expérimenter, Paris, Christian Bourgois Editeur (épuisé); édition originale disponible : Representing and Intervening, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
- Hacking Ian
[1999/2001] Entre science et réalité. La construction sociale de quoi ?, Paris, La Découverte
- Häggqvist S.
(1996), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Almqvist & Wiksel, Stockholm.
- Horowitz T. et G. Massey
(eds.) (1991), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Savage, Rowman and Littlefield [online: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/960/].
- Humphreys P.
(1993), “Seven Theses on Thought Experiments”, dans Earman, J. et al. (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External World. Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, University of Pittsburgh Press/Universitätsverlag Konstanz, Pittsburgh/Konstanz, pp. 205-227.
- Ierodiakonou K. et Roux S.
(eds.) (2011) Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts, Brill.
- Jean-Pierre Dupuy
Pour un catastrophisme éclairé - Quand l'impossible est certain, Seuil, 2002
- Koyré A.
(1960), “Galileo's Treatise De Motu Gravium: the use and the abuse of imaginary experiment”, Revue d'Histoire des Sciences, 13, pp. 197-245.
- Kuhn T.
(1964), “A Function for Thought Experiments”, dans Kuhn T. (1977), The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 240-265.
- Kuhn Thomas S.
[1962/1983] La structure des révolutions scientifiques, Paris, Flammarion, collection Champs
- Lennox J. G.
(2005), “Darwin's Methodological Evolution”, Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 1, pp.85-99.
- Mach E.
(1896), “Über Gedankenexperimente”, Zeitschrift für den physikalischen und chemischen Unterricht, 10, pp. 1-5.
- McAllister J.
(2004), “Thought Experiments and the Belief in Phenomena”, Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Philosophy of Science, 71, pp. 1164-1175.
- Michel Callon, Pierre Lascoumes, Yannick Barthe
Agir dans un monde incertain, Seuil, 2001
- Miščević N.
(1992), “Mental models and thought experiments”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 6, pp. 215-226.
- Moue A. S., Masavetas K. A. et Karayianni H.
(2006), “Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 61-75.
- Nersessian N. J.
(1992), “How do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science”, dans R. N. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3-44.
- Nersessian N. J.
(1993), “In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modelling”, dans Hull D., Forbes M. et Okruhlik K. (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 2, East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 291-301.
- Norton J.
(2004a), “On Thought Experiments: Is there more to the argument?”, Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Philosophy of Science, 71, pp. 1139-1151 [online: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000719/].
- Norton J.
(2004b), “Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism?”, dans C. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 44-66 [online: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000960/].
- Nozick Robert
[2001] Invariances. The Structure of the Objective World, Cambridge, Harvard University Press
- Olivier Godard, Claude Henry, Patrick Lagadec et Erwann Michel-Kerjan
Traité des nouveaux risques.Précaution, crise, assurances, Gallimard, 2002
- Ørsted H. C.
(1811), Förste Indledning til den Almindelige Naturlære, J. S. Schultz, Copenaghen.
- Peijnenburg J. et Atkinson D.
(2003), “When are thought experiments poor ones?”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 34, pp. 305-322.
- Platone, République, 327a-621d.
Platone, République, 327a-621d.
- Popper K.
(1959), “On the use and misuse of imaginary experiments, especially in Quantum Theory”, dans The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, pp. 442- 456 (appendix *xi).
- Putnam H.
(1973), “Meaning and Reference”, Journal of Philosophy, 70, 19, pp. 699-711.
- Putnam H.
(1975), “Meaning of ‘Meaning'”, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science,7, pp. 131-193.
- Putnam H.
(1992), “Brains in a Vat”, dans DeRose K. et Warfield T. A. (eds.), Skepticism: a Contemporary Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Searle J. R.
(1980), “Minds, Brain and Programs”, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, pp 417-424.
- Snooks R. J.
(2006), “Another scientific practice separating chemistry from physics: thought experiments”, Foundations of Chemistry, 8, pp. 255-270.
- Sorensen R.
(1992), Thought Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Swirski P.
(2007), Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution and Game Theory, Routledge, London & New York.
- Witt-Hansen J.
(1976), “H.C. Örsted, Immanuel Kant, and the Thought Experiment”, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 13, pp. 48-65.
